Synthetic example · No client data · Demonstration workflow

Subsea integrity · Cathodic protection survey

Subsea CP and Anode Survey

Cathodic protection potential survey and anode depletion assessment for subsea assets.

Synthetic case study. Representative offshore workflow. No client data used. For demonstration only.

Operational pain points

Representative challenges SurveyIQ addresses — synthetic scenario, not a client claim.

  • CP survey data is stored separately from ROV navigation and structure context.

  • Probe calibration records are difficult to audit during client review.

  • Anode depletion estimates rely on manual spreadsheet calculations.

  • Trend comparison to previous campaigns lacks structured historical indexing.

Representative workflow in SurveyIQ

From scope intake to deliverables — a demonstration workflow for cathodic protection survey.

  1. 01

    Scope intake

    Upload or paste the CP survey scope. SurveyIQ structures objectives, methods, and deliverables for review.

  2. 02

    Missing information

    Blocking and advisory gaps are surfaced early — vessel nomination, sensor configs, reporting templates, and interface points.

  3. 03

    Procedure pack

    Draft acquisition, HSE, marine, and reporting procedures are generated with source references for human approval.

  4. 04

    Work packages

    Approved procedures become executable work packages with owners, dependencies, and readiness states.

  5. 05

    Command center

    Offshore teams work from one project truth — department cards, stop-work awareness, and today's plan.

  6. 06

    Logbook & evidence

    Department logbooks capture events, downtime, QC snapshots, findings, and DPR source notes in real time.

  7. 07

    DPR & deliverables

    Daily progress reports and final deliverables are assembled from verified project facts, not end-of-shift reconstruction.

Example scope elements

  • CP potential readings on pipeline, structures, and tie-ins at nominated points.
  • Anode visual assessment and depletion grading.
  • ROV-assisted probe deployment at deep nodes.
  • CP trend charts against acceptance criteria.
  • CP survey report with recommendation memo.

How SurveyIQ supports this workflow

Procedures generated

  • CP-020 — Probe calibration and verification
  • CP-021 — Reading protocol and acceptance criteria
  • ROV-040 — Deep node CP measurement
  • ANO-001 — Anode visual assessment
  • QC-050 — Reading validation and outliers
  • REP-050 — CP trend and recommendation report

Work packages

  • CP-040 — CP potential survey
  • ROV-040 — Deep node measurements
  • ANO-010 — Anode assessment
  • REP-050 — CP reporting

Department logbooks

CPROVHSEMarineReporting

Deliverables & client portal outputs

Campaign deliverables

  • CP reading tables and trend charts
  • Anode condition register
  • Calibration certificates index
  • Recommendation memo
  • CP survey report

Client portal (released views)

  • Released CP summary charts
  • Anode register
  • Report review status

Representative outcomes

Illustrative metrics for demonstration — not measured client results.

Calibration audit trail

Complete

Probe calibrations indexed in logbook with timestamps.

Outlier detection

QC-flagged

Readings outside criteria trigger review workflow.

Deep node coverage

ROV-linked

ROV dives tied to CP work packages and evidence.

Trend reporting

Structured

Report sections built from verified reading sets.

Frequently asked questions

Can CP calibrations be audited?

Yes. Calibration events are recorded in department logbooks with evidence attachments.

Does SurveyIQ integrate ROV and CP workflows?

ROV dives for deep-node readings are work packages linked to CP survey procedures.

Is this based on client CP data?

No. All CP values and asset names are fictional representative examples.

See SurveyIQ on your next offshore campaign

Book a demo, send a scope of work, or watch the product overview — all synthetic examples, no client data required.

Subsea Cathodic Protection Survey Case Study | SurveyIQ