Findings with evidence
Linked
Each finding ties to dive event, node reference, and attachments.
Synthetic example · No client data · Demonstration workflow
Offshore structures · ROV visual inspection
Jacket Integrity Visual Inspection
ROV-led jacket and subsea structure visual inspection with findings register and evidence chain.
Synthetic case study. Representative offshore workflow. No client data used. For demonstration only.
Operational pain points
Representative challenges SurveyIQ addresses — synthetic scenario, not a client claim.
ROV dive logs, photo indexes, and findings are captured in incompatible formats.
Structure node references (members, nodes, elevations) are inconsistent across shifts.
Critical findings lack immediate visibility to project managers and client reps.
Final inspection reports require manual assembly from dive notes and image folders.
Representative workflow in SurveyIQ
From scope intake to deliverables — a demonstration workflow for rov visual inspection.
- 01
Scope intake
Upload or paste the ROV visual inspection scope. SurveyIQ structures objectives, methods, and deliverables for review.
- 02
Missing information
Blocking and advisory gaps are surfaced early — vessel nomination, sensor configs, reporting templates, and interface points.
- 03
Procedure pack
Draft acquisition, HSE, marine, and reporting procedures are generated with source references for human approval.
- 04
Work packages
Approved procedures become executable work packages with owners, dependencies, and readiness states.
- 05
Command center
Offshore teams work from one project truth — department cards, stop-work awareness, and today's plan.
- 06
Logbook & evidence
Department logbooks capture events, downtime, QC snapshots, findings, and DPR source notes in real time.
- 07
DPR & deliverables
Daily progress reports and final deliverables are assembled from verified project facts, not end-of-shift reconstruction.
Example scope elements
- General visual inspection of jacket members, nodes, and appurtenances.
- Close visual inspection of previously reported anomalies.
- Marine growth and coating condition grading at standard nodes.
- CP spot checks at representative members.
- Inspection report with photo register and findings summary.
How SurveyIQ supports this workflow
Procedures generated
- ROV-030 — Dive planning and structure node grid
- ROV-031 — General visual inspection protocol
- ROV-032 — Close visual and measurement capture
- CP-010 — Spot CP readings at nominated members
- QC-040 — Photo naming and evidence indexing
- REP-040 — Findings register and report assembly
Work packages
- ROV-030 — Jacket inspection dives
- CP-030 — Spot CP campaign
- QC-040 — Evidence QC
- REP-040 — Inspection reporting
Department logbooks
ROVCPHSEMarineReporting
Deliverables & client portal outputs
Campaign deliverables
- Dive logs with node references
- Photo and video register
- Findings register with severity grades
- CP spot-check table
- Inspection summary report
Client portal (released views)
- Released findings register
- Evidence index
- DPR summaries
- Inspection report status
Representative outcomes
Illustrative metrics for demonstration — not measured client results.
Shift handover
Structured
ROV logbook preserves node grid progress between teams.
Critical finding alert
Command center
Stop-work and severity flags visible to PM and client rep views.
Report assembly
Fact-based
Inspection report built from verified dive and finding records.
Frequently asked questions
Does SurveyIQ support structure node referencing?
ROV procedures and logbooks can follow a consistent node grid defined in the procedure pack.
Can photos link to findings?
Yes. Evidence attachments index to findings with audit trail for reporting.
Is this a real jacket inspection?
No. Jacket Integrity Visual Inspection is a fictional representative scenario.
See SurveyIQ on your next offshore campaign
Book a demo, send a scope of work, or watch the product overview — all synthetic examples, no client data required.