Target status
Live
Open vs investigated vs cleared tracked in command center.
Synthetic example · No client data · Demonstration workflow
Offshore UXO · UXO anomaly investigation
UXO Anomaly Investigation Campaign
Geophysical detection, ROV investigation, and clearance reporting for unexploded ordnance anomalies.
Synthetic case study. Representative offshore workflow. No client data used. For demonstration only.
Operational pain points
Representative challenges SurveyIQ addresses — synthetic scenario, not a client claim.
UXO campaigns generate large anomaly lists with inconsistent classification codes.
ROV investigation results are stored separately from geophysical acquisition QC.
Clearance decisions lack structured audit trails for regulator review.
Re-acquisition after weather downtime loses track of investigated vs open targets.
Representative workflow in SurveyIQ
From scope intake to deliverables — a demonstration workflow for uxo anomaly investigation.
- 01
Scope intake
Upload or paste the UXO investigation scope. SurveyIQ structures objectives, methods, and deliverables for review.
- 02
Missing information
Blocking and advisory gaps are surfaced early — vessel nomination, sensor configs, reporting templates, and interface points.
- 03
Procedure pack
Draft acquisition, HSE, marine, and reporting procedures are generated with source references for human approval.
- 04
Work packages
Approved procedures become executable work packages with owners, dependencies, and readiness states.
- 05
Command center
Offshore teams work from one project truth — department cards, stop-work awareness, and today's plan.
- 06
Logbook & evidence
Department logbooks capture events, downtime, QC snapshots, findings, and DPR source notes in real time.
- 07
DPR & deliverables
Daily progress reports and final deliverables are assembled from verified project facts, not end-of-shift reconstruction.
Example scope elements
- MBES, SSS, and magnetometer survey for anomaly detection.
- Anomaly classification and prioritisation workshop outputs.
- ROV or diver investigation of high-priority targets.
- Disposition decisions: clear, monitor, or remove.
- UXO clearance report and target database deliverable.
How SurveyIQ supports this workflow
Procedures generated
- UXO-010 — Geophysical acquisition and target picking
- UXO-011 — Anomaly classification protocol
- ROV-070 — Target investigation and ID capture
- CLR-020 — Disposition and clearance sign-off
- HSE-008 — Exclusion zones and notification protocol
- REP-110 — UXO clearance report assembly
Work packages
- SUR-070 — Geophysical detection survey
- UXO-020 — Classification workshop
- ROV-070 — Target investigation
- CLR-020 — Clearance disposition
- REP-110 — UXO reporting
Department logbooks
SurveyUXOROVHSEMarineReporting
Deliverables & client portal outputs
Campaign deliverables
- Geophysical survey products
- Anomaly target database
- Investigation photo/video register
- Disposition decision log
- UXO clearance report
Client portal (released views)
- Target status dashboard
- Released disposition log
- Investigation evidence index
- Clearance report status
Representative outcomes
Illustrative metrics for demonstration — not measured client results.
Investigation evidence
Linked
ROV events tied to anomaly IDs and geophysical contacts.
Clearance audit
Structured
Disposition decisions with approver trail in work packages.
Re-acquisition recovery
Work-package state
Weather downtime preserves target investigation progress.
Frequently asked questions
Can anomaly targets be tracked through clearance?
Yes. Target databases link geophysical contacts to investigation and disposition records.
Are disposition decisions auditable?
Clearance sign-offs are routed through work packages with human approval.
Is this real UXO data?
No. All targets and dispositions are fictional representative examples.
See SurveyIQ on your next offshore campaign
Book a demo, send a scope of work, or watch the product overview — all synthetic examples, no client data required.